Electronic Resources and Heterodox Economists
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Conversation or monologue ? On advising heterodox economists
This paper suggests that heterodox economists should not think of themselves as economists first, and only secondarily as heterodox, and must emphasize methodological issues, in particular the different assumptions (or axioms) implicit in their theories vis-àvis the mainstream. The paper argues that the notion of a cutting edge of the mainstream, which is breaking up with orthodoxy, is misleadi...
متن کاملThe electronic journal: sophisters, economists, and calculators.
Burke surely knew whereof he spake. Neurology, in particular, seems besieged by sophisters and economists, but the only question that will be addressed here is whether there is a useful place for the calculators, or at least their latter day descendant, the computer, before our glory is extinguished forever. Thomas Carlyle, who died in 1881, wrote: “these are the three great elements of modern ...
متن کاملPlurality in Orthodox and Heterodox Economics*
Several observers have noted signs of a growing plurality in mainstream economics. At the same time there has been a growing emphasis in heterodox economics on commonality. The purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of plurality in economics in order to make sense of these characterisations, and to consider the issues raised by this plurality. The critical factor is to distinguish betwe...
متن کاملThe Nature of Heterodox Economics
This is the last of 10 papers in this journal’s Symposium on Reorienting Economics, which has taken Tony Lawson’s book Reorienting Economics as its focal point. These papers together with Lawson’s replies to each (heretofore unpublished) will be published late in 2007 by the University of Michigan Press under the title Tony Lawson and His Critics. The contents of this collection can be viewed a...
متن کاملThe nature of heterodox economics
Heterodoxy serves as an umbrella term to cover the coming together of separate projects or traditions. In answering the question, ‘what distinguishes heterodoxy from the orthodoxy?’, the author argues that matters of ontology are central. In answering the question, ‘how are the various traditions that make up the modern heterodoxy to be distinguished from each other?’, the author defends criter...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1394874